Tag Archives: NASB

Time for a new study Bible? My Selected Version and Why

After researching different Bible translations and the guiding principles behind the methods used to translate the leading versions, I’ve decided to use the New American Standard Bible (NASB) as my daily reading version.

This translation sticks with the literal meaning of the words for translation and does not rewrite the text based on a committee interpretation of the original author’s theology.

This was important to me. I wanted a version that was in modern English but also literally translated from the original texts.

There are versions in circulation that do not literally translate the words from the original texts, and they often rewrite whole sections based from the translators’ opinion of what they believe the original author’s theological idea was (Dynamic Equivalent translation). This translation method is not acceptable to me and should not be called a Bible translation. It is misleading to call a non-literal translation a “Bible”. These non-literal translations should be called “commentaries”, not Bibles.

If you use my affiliate link below to purchase a new NASB version of the Bible you can find many options to choose from; Study Bibles, Note taking Bibles, Text and Reference Bibles, etc..

I choose a smaller zip up Bible to make it more portable.

NASB Bibles

NASB Bibles

History of the NASB Bible Translation

First Published: 1971 
Updated:1995

In the 1880s the King James Version became the basis for the English Revised Version. The American counterpart was published in 1901 as the American Standard Version. A product of both British and American scholarship, the ASV has been highly regarded for its scholarship and accuracy.

By the middle of the twentieth century, The Lockman Foundation, a non-profit Christian corporation of La Habra, California, felt an urgency to preserve these and other lasting values of the ASV by incorporating recent discoveries of Hebrew and Greek textual sources and by rendering them into more current English.

The Lockman Foundation published the Gospel of John in 1960, all four Gospels as a unit in 1962, the New Testament in 1963, and the entire Bible in 1971. Sixteen translators worked on each Testament. More than 50 scholars in various capacities devoted more than 25,000 hours of research to the New Testament alone.

The NASB represented a conservative, literal approach to translation. While this translation followed the principles used in the ASV, the NASB should be viewed as a new translation rather than merely an update of the ASV.

The Lockman Foundation completed an update of the NASB in 1995. More than 20 translators (conservative Bible scholars representing a variety of denominational backgrounds) spent nearly three years completing the project. The team carefully adhered to the principles of literal translation and made no attempt to interpret Scripture through translation. This method of translation stands in contrast to the thought-for-thought method known as dynamic equivalence. The result was a word-for-word translation that is both accurate and readable.

The 1995 update makes several important refinements with regard to the original NASB:

  • It no longer uses “Thee” and “Thou” in reference to Deity
  • Phrases have been smoothed out
  • Words that have changed meaning have been updated
  • Verbs that have a wide range of meaning have been updated to better account for their use in the context
  • Punctuation and paragraphing have been formatted to fit today’s standards
  • Notes about the ancient manuscripts have been revised to include more new and interesting facts

Reference: https://www.christianbook.com/page/bibles/about-bibles/about-translations/about-the-nasb?event=Bibles|1001885

Choosing A Bible Translation

Literal translation or dynamic equivalant? What’s the difference?

Choosing a Bible by Leland Ryken is a short expository essay/book (30 pages) about the differences in Bible translation philosophy.

I highly encourage you all to read it. You can barrow my copy if needed.

But Dr. Ryken clearly articulates why literal translation versions are essential.

I’ll be sticking with my NASB and KJV versions for sure. ESV, RSV and NKJV are also literal.

You will probably want to steer clear of other version translated in the last half centry unless you want the translators or a committee opinion on what they think should be the meaning of a phrase.

And Dr. Ryken makes clear that sometimes translating the Bible into totally new languages may require this for a quick turnaround on the field by a translator. But English translation and finalized language translations should not be using dynamic equivalence as a translation method.

If a reader wants an opinion on the meaning of a verse they can buy a commentary. They need to know what is an actual translation not including opinion.

Join the discussion on the forums.